Reflective essay Your reflective essay should address the following points:

Reflective essay

Your reflective essay should address the following points:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Reflective essay Your reflective essay should address the following points:
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
  • How did you evaluate your records to assess their quality?
  • How did you use the principles of precision and recall to evaluate your use of elements and data values?
  • How did you use feedback on your records to improve the quality of each record?

 Marking criteria:

  • Word length (maximum): 2,000 words
  • Written work is clear, well organized and includes appropriate references.
  • The submitted work answers the questions posed in the assignment prompt.

These are the three codes:

  • Dublin Core
  • VRA Core
  • EAD

following are the feedbacks given by my teacher of the three assignments.

  1. Dublin Core

These are the requirements then:

feedback from teacher:

Areas of strength  

 You made a consistent effort to use element encoding schemes to enhance the granularity and precision of your DC record.

Areas of improvement  

There is one instance where your xml is not valid

  • VRA Core

These are the requirements then:

Areas of strength  

 You selected appropriate data values throughout your record and you made a clear effort to create granular metadata that a wide range of users could understand.

Feedback from teacher:

Areas of improvement  

Your description set does not structure the information you included in your <display> element.

Remember, display and indexing information perform particular functions in a relational database.

Remember you need to create two image records. One for a general view of the work and one detail of the work. 

  • EAD

These are the requirements then:

Feedback from teacher:

Areas of strength  

Your <eadheader> is granular and accurate, you made excellent use of EAD elements and attributes to structure information about the finding aid.

Overall your <dsc> is logical and complete, you make a good effort to distinguish between series, subseries and items. One suggestion: when you change from <c03> to <c04> explore options for your level attribute.

Areas of improvement  

You did not include the DTD information in your finding aid. This information is incredibly important because it ensures I can check your XML against a schema specification.

Your <controlaccess> is, overall, well structured and you distinguish between subjects, personal names. You’ll want to consider your use of <geogname> though, that implies geographic information will be encoded, not a subject.

ORDER NOW »»

and taste our undisputed quality.