Question: Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreements between experts in disciplines?

Question: Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreements between experts in disciplines? Define your answer with reference to 2 areas of knowledge?
 
Introduction:

1. Introduce the question and explain what it means
2. Introduce the first area of knowledge (History) and give small background on what you will mention, the example you will use about ww2, and hiroshima bomb
3. Introduce the second area of knowledge ( sciences) and small background on the example, Einstein, and cancer
4. Transition to first body paragraph

 
Bp1: History

1. Define History
2. Include Knowledge question about history ( How can historians disagree with each other about an event in the past while given the same facts?
3. Explain why historians might disagree with each other link below might help http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/why-do-historians-disagree
4. First example AJP Taylor (give background on him) vs Hugh (give background on him background) then talk about their disagreement about WW2 but the historians have to have the same background such as degree or what they have accomplished and have to be in the same year

Trevor-Roper.http://thecud.com/live/content/controversy-history-ajp-taylor%E2%80%99s-origins-second-world-war
4: give reason of why they disagreed (might be either imagination, intuition, reasoning)
5: second example: Hiroshima Bomb but the historians have to have the same background such as degree or what they have accomplished and have to be in the same year
http://glencoe.mheducation.com/sites/0076621367/student_view0/chapter26/where_historians_disagree.html
6: why would they disagree based on the ways of knowing such as imagination, intuition or reasoning.
7: restate knowledge question and go to other paragraph
 
Bp2: Science

1. Define science
2. Include Knowledge question about science: How can scientists disagree use each other about the same theory?
3. Why would professionals in the field disagree in that field such as the areas of knowing: reasoning, imagination, intuition
4. First example (background on each person before stating the example): Einstein and Bohr but they have to have the same background such as degree or what they have accomplished and have to be in the same year

https://www.ukessays.com/essays/philosophy/disagreement-aids-the-pursuit-of-knowledge-philosophy-essay.php

5. Why they disagreed ( way of knowing such as imagination, intuition, reasoning)
6. Second Example(background on each person before stating the example): Cancer and doctors but they have to have the same background such as degree or what they have accomplished and have to be in the same year

https://www.ukessays.com/essays/philosophy/disagreement-aids-the-pursuit-of-knowledge-philosophy-essay.php

7. Why they disagreed (ways of knowing)
8. Restate knowledge question about science

 
Bp3: Counter claim

1. Include Knowledge question about professionals not disagreeing with each other (How can professionals in both history and science disagree about a theory or event when given the same facts?)
2. Example #1 history (background on each person before stating the example): http://alphahistory.com/holocaust/historiography-of-the-holocaust/ but they have to have the same background such as degree or what they have accomplished and have to be in the same year
3. Example #2 science (background on each person before stating the example):
4. Restate knowledge question

 
Conclusion:

1. Restate question
2. Restate both knowledge questions and the counterclaim
3. End it with a nice question to ask the reader