Public Health Discussion

Public Health Discussion

“Don’t Smile Until Christmas”

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Public Health Discussion
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The Wongs would partially agree with the recommendation for two main reasons. First, the Wongs would argue that total adherence to the adage would imply poor planning. A flexible approach to the recommendation, as per the Wongs, would reflect effective planning and consideration for the context. In line with the suggestions by Charles (2011), the Wongs would highlight the central role of first impressions in cultivating healthy relationships in classroom management. This role is reflected in the adage “Don’t smile until Christmas” to some extent. The recommendation suggests the need to avoid humor and jokes in the early phases of classroom engagement to ensure control. Rigid adherence to the recommendation is not desirable as suggested in the second reason presented below outlining why the Wongs would partially agree with it.

This second reason is that the Wongs would argue that the students have an important role in building classroom relationships and the teacher should share classroom plans with them. The adage does not resonate with this view because it appears to encourage the teacher to alienate students in classroom management plans. As per the Wongs, the students should participate in carrying out classroom plans (history dissertation help). The smile, therefore, should be part of the techniques the teacher employs to influence students to embrace the desired behavior. In this regard, the teacher assumes the role of leadership. As a leader, the teacher should gauge situations when carrying out plans to identify whether certain techniques such as humor or a smile would be appropriate to inspire the students. Strict adherence to the adage would limit the teacher’s ability to inspire students as a leader in classroom management.


Charles, C. M. (2011). Building classroom discipline (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

According to the World Health Organization, public health is the responsibility of government to ensure that everybody is well. Everyone’s right to the highest attainable quality of health is a human right, and WHO is calling for all governments and other responsible bodies to work together to ensure that it is readily available and affordable to everyone (Lohman, Wilson & Marston, 2017). When health is recognized as a human right, governments are given legal obligations to ensure that acceptable, timely, and accessible healthcare is provided. Sanitation, clean and potable water, housing, food, gender equality, and education are some of the underlying determinants of health that can be given.

The highest attainable health requirements are linked to a clear set of legal obligations to ensure that citizens have access to healthcare services without being discriminated against. Human rights violations are a major factor in declining public health. Vulnerable groups are often at a greater risk of being ignored or treated unfairly. To achieve more firm and reliable results in the battle against health inequality, governments must develop a coherent and conscience strategy for supporting gender equality and human rights policies (Lohman, Wilson & Marston, 2017; learned writers). These structures will pave the way for the creation of a structure and core strengths that will boost services and everyone’s well-being.


Lohman, D., Wilson, D., & Marston, J. (2017). Advocacy and human rights issues. Building integrated palliative care programs and services, 185.




and taste our undisputed quality.