Emergency Nursing

ا
Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) – Emergency Nursing

Emergency Nursing Care II Theory (NURS 521)

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Emergency Nursing
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Literature Review Paper Evaluation Criteria

 

Literature Review Paper Guidelines

Identify a patient-related clinical issue (e.g., patients’ response to illness or therapy, nursing intervention strategy). Then review the literature specific to the identified issue. The review should reflect a scholarly writing in terms of knowledge, analysis, originality, synthesis, and structure and organization. The content should include: significance of the issue; structured, logical, and organized discussion and understanding of the current literature; research-based conclusion; and recommendations for future research.

 

The paper should not exceed 15 double spaced pages excluding illustrations, tables, figures, and references.

 

Due Date April 16, 2020

 

Student Name:
Student ID:
Semester/Year:
Overall Given Mark: / 30

 

 

Criteria for Evaluation of the Literature Review Paper:

No Concept Poor

1

Acceptable

3

Ideal

5

Given Mark
A Introduction:
A.1 Clear overview of paper, demonstrates importance of topic and extrapolate the key points from the literature
B Body:
B.1 Balanced viewpoint: Objective, balanced view from various perspectives
B.2 Coherent theme: Each cited study related to the topic and to other studies
B.3 Depth and breadth of research: Variety of studies and attention to detail about the topic
B.4 Applications: Concepts discussed are related to real life situations
B.5 Significance: Rationalize the practical significance of the research problem
B.6 Comprehension: Clear explanation and interpretation of the key points and vocabularies explored from the literature
B.7 Variables: Articulate important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic
B.8 Methodologies: Identify the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field, and their advantages and disadvantages
B.9 Analysis: Includes a variety of sources from high-quality journals and publications that are analyzed for differences and commonalities about the topic, comparing and contrasting a variety of views from literature and practice
B.10 Argument: Developed in a coherent, logical, well balanced and sequential manner
C Synthesis and Conclusion:
C.1 Synthesized and gained a new perspective on the literature
C.2 Information synthesized and brought to a clear and logical conclusion
C.3 Evidence of creativity and independent thinking
C.4 Research question(s) are formed through the literature review and clearly stated.
D Evaluation
D.1 Identifying areas for future development in research, practice and education
E Organization and Alignment:
E.1 Information logically organized with good flow.
F Writing:
F.1 Correct spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, word usage, and capitalization, with the use of the standard English which demonstrates good grammar.
G APA:
G.1 Correct, accurate and consistent of use of APA in body of paper
H References:
H.1 References correctly typed, appropriate number and quality
Total (out of 100)

ORDER NOW »»

and taste our undisputed quality.